4.0 Article

Smooth Muscle Cell Notch2 Is Not Required for Atherosclerotic Plaque Formation in ApoE Null Mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF VASCULAR RESEARCH
卷 59, 期 5, 页码 261-274

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000525258

关键词

Atherosclerosis; Notch; Smooth muscle cell; Phenotype switching; Apolipoprotein E

资金

  1. NIH/NHLBI [R01 HL141149]
  2. American Heart Association [16PRE29870001]
  3. NIH/NIGMS [1P20GM12130, U54GM115516]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The loss of SMC Notch2 does not significantly reduce the formation of atherosclerotic lesions, although there are changes in SMC and inflammation in the early stages of plaque formation.
Introduction: We previously identified Notch2 in smooth muscle cells (SMC) in human atherosclerosis and found that signaling via Notch2 suppressed human SMC proliferation. Thus, we tested whether loss of Notch2 in SMC would alter atherosclerotic plaque progression using a mouse model. Methods: Atherogenesis was examined at the brachiocephalic artery and aortic root in a vascular SMC null (inducible smooth muscle myosin heavy chain Cre) Notch2 strain on the ApoE(-/-) background. We measured plaque morphology and size, as well as lipid, inflammation, and smooth muscle actin content after Western diet. Results: We generated an inducible SMC Notch2 null on the ApoE(-/-) background. We observed similar to 90% recombination efficiency with no detectable Notch2 in the SMC. Loss of SMC Notch2 did not significantly change plaque size, lipid content, necrotic core, or medial area. However, loss of SMC Notch2 reduced the contractile SMC in brachiocephalic artery lesions and increased inflammatory content in aortic root lesions after 6 weeks of Western diet. These changes were not present with loss of SMC Notch2 after 14 weeks of Western diet. Conclusions: Our data show that loss of SMC Notch2 does not significantly reduce atherosclerotic lesion formation, although in early stages of plaque formation there are changes in SMC and inflammation. (c) 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据