4.8 Review

Molecular Engineering of Noncovalent Dimerization

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 144, 期 33, 页码 14962-14975

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c02434

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22171103, 22193020, 22193021]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2021YFA1501600]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article introduces the recent progress in the molecular engineering of noncovalent dimerization and discusses how supramolecular restrictions can enhance the performance and functionality of molecular-based materials, as well as the characteristics of pseudostatic dimers.
Dimers are probably the simplest model to facilitate the understanding of fundamental physical and chemical processes that take place in much-expanded systems like aggregates, crystals, and other solid states. The molecular interplay within a dimer differentiates it from the corresponding monomeric state and determines its features. Molecular engineering of noncovalent dimerization through applied supramolecular restrictions enables additional control over molecular interplay, particularly over its dynamic aspect. This Perspective introduces the recent effort that has been made in the molecular engineering of noncovalent dimerization, including supramolecular dimers, folda-dimers, and macrocyclic dimers. It showcases how the variation in supramolecular restrictions endows molecular-based materials with improved performance and/or functions like enhanced emission, room-temperature phosphorescence, and effective catalysis. We particularly discuss pseudostatic dimers that can sustain molecular interplay for a long period of time, yet are still flexible enough to adapt to variations. The pseudostatic feature allows for active species to decay along an alternate pathway, thereby spinning off emerging features that are not readily accessible from conventional dynamic systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据