4.8 Article

Catalytic Chemo-, Regio-, Diastereo-, and Enantioselective Bromochlorination of Unsaturated Systems Enabled by Lewis Base-Controlled Chloride Release

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 144, 期 29, 页码 13294-13301

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c04588

关键词

-

资金

  1. Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT) [RR200039]
  2. Welch Foundation [AA-2077-20210327]
  3. Baylor University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new Lewis base-catalyzed bromochlorination strategy for unsaturated systems is described, which is mechanistically distinct and utilizes thionyl chloride as a latent chloride source in combination with as little as 1 mol % of triphenylphosphine or triphenylphosphine oxide as Lewis basic activators. This strategy exhibits excellent site selectivity and can access a wide variety of vicinal bromochlorides with high regio- and diastereoselectivity. The precision installation of Br, Cl, and I in various combinations is also demonstrated.
A new strategy is described for the Lewis base-catalyzed bromochlorination of unsaturated systems that is mechanistically distinct from prior methodologies. The novelty of this method hinges on the utilization of thionyl chloride as a latent chloride source in combination with as little as 1 mol % of triphenylphosphine or triphenylphosphine oxide as Lewis basic activators. This metal-free, catalytic chemo-, regio-, and diastereoselective bromochlorination of alkenes and alkynes exhibits excellent site selectivity in polyunsaturated systems and provides access to a wide variety of vicinal bromochlorides with up to > 20:1 regio-and diastereoselectivity. The precision installation of Br, Cl, and I in various combinations is also demonstrated by simply varying the commercial halogenating reagents employed. Notably, when a chiral Lewis base promoter is employed, an enantioselective bromochlorination of chalcones is possible with up to a 92:8 enantiomeric ratio when utilizing only 1-3 mol % of (DHQD)(2)PHAL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据