Medical Student Perspectives on the Ethics of Pelvic Exams Under Anesthesia: A Multi-Institutional Study

OBJECTIVE: Pelvic examinations under anesthesia (EUAs) are routine components of gynecologic surgery and often used to educate students about female pelvic anatomy. This multi-institutional survey study aims to describe students' experiences with conducting educa-tional pelvic EUAs and their attitudes around the ethics of informed consent for these exams.DESIGN: An anonymous survey of Likert and open-text response questions about institutions' practices around educational pelvic EUAs was sent to medical students.SETTING: Medical schools included Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Meharry Medical College, and Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University.PARTICIPANTS: A total 305 medical students who had completed their obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) clerkship between June 2019 and March 2020 filled out the survey (33% response rate).RESULTS: Overall, 84% of students performed at least 1 pelvic EUA during their clerkship. Of the 42% (142) of students that observed patient informed consent pro-cesses most or every time, 67% reported they never or rarely witnessed an explicit explanation that a medical student may perform a pelvic EUA. Analysis of open-text responses found that students wanted to uphold patient autonomy but felt they did not have the personal auton-omy to object to performing pelvic EUAs that they believed were unconsented. They faced significant emo-tional distress when consent processes were at odds with their personal ethos and professional ethical norms. Students favored more standardized and explicit patient consent processes for educational pelvic EUAs.CONCLUSIONS: While students regularly perform pelvic EUAs, their involvement is inconsistently disclosed to patients, causing significant distress to students and risking erosion of students' attitudes about upholding patient autonomy and informed consent. Medical institutions must develop consistent, ethical, and patient-centered processes for trainee disclosure around pelvic EUAs. (J Surg Ed 79:1413-1421. (c) 2022 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Automated summary

While students regularly perform pelvic EUAs, their involvement is inconsistently disclosed to patients, causing significant distress to students and risking erosion of students' attitudes about upholding patient autonomy and informed consent.