4.5 Article

Regeneration of mandibular defects using adipose tissue mesenchymal stromal cells in combination with human serum-derived scaffolds

期刊

JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
卷 44, 期 9, 页码 1356-1365

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.06.012

关键词

AT-MSCs; Bone; Regeneration; Serum; Scaffold; Autologous

资金

  1. National + D + Plan - Institute de Salud Carlos III (Spanish Government) [PI11/01833]
  2. FEDER (Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bone regeneration is a challenging issue. Traditional solutions bring risks, potential complications, and morbidity. The aim of the present study was to regenerate critical-sized mandible defects in athymic rats with adipose tissue mesenchymal stromal cells (AT-MSCs) in combination with human serum-derived scaffolds. Two approaches to treatment were performed. The first approach used differentiated stromal cells that became osteogenic cell lines. The second approach used no pre-differentiation. Follow-up periods were 45 days and 90 days. Both cell types were combined with human serum-derived scaffolds. Afterward, histological (haematoxylin eosin and Masson's Trichrome stain modified by Goldner), immunohistochemical (human vimentin and Stro-1), and radiological (microCT) studies were performed. The level of calcification between the groups was compared by analysis of variance, and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. The results demonstrate that bone regeneration can be achieved with both undifferentiated and pre-differentiated cells, but that the structure and level of calcification were better achieved with pre-differentiated cells (p < 0.05). The scaffold is suitable for this cell type, is osteo-conductive and simple to perform. This article highlights the possible application of adipose tissue mesenchymal stromal cells in combination with a non-mineralized scaffold in bone regeneration. (C) 2016 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据