4.6 Article

Phases of new physics in the CMB

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2016/01/007

关键词

particle physics - cosmology connection; cosmological neutrinos; cosmological parameters from CMBR

资金

  1. Starting Grant of the European Research Council (ERC) [279617]
  2. Cambridge European Scholarship of the Cambridge Trust
  3. STFC Studentship
  4. NSERC Discovery Grant
  5. ESA Member States, NASA, and Canada
  6. BIS National E-Infrastructure Capital [ST/J005673/1]
  7. STFC [ST/H008586/1, ST/K00333X/1]
  8. STFC [ST/M00418X/1, ST/M007065/1, ST/L000636/1, ST/J005673/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/M00418X/1, ST/K00333X/1, ST/J005673/1, ST/H008586/1, ST/M007065/1, 1481109, ST/L000636/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fluctuations in the cosmic neutrino background are known to produce a phase shift in the acoustic peaks of the cosmic microwave background. It is through the sensitivity to this effect that the recent CMB data has provided a robust detection of free-streaming neutrinos. In this paper, we revisit the phase shift of the CMB anisotropy spectrum as a probe of new physics. The phase shift is particularly interesting because its physical origin is strongly constrained by the analytic properties of the Green's function of the gravitational potential. For adiabatic fluctuations, a phase shift requires modes that propagate faster than the speed of fluctuations in the photon-baryon plasma. This possibility is realized by free-streaming relativistic particles, such as neutrinos or other forms of dark radiation. Alternatively, a phase shift can arise from isocurvature fluctuations. We present simple models to illustrate each of these effects. We then provide observational constraints from the Planck temperature and polarization data on additional forms of radiation. We also forecast the capabilities of future CMB Stage IV experiments. Whenever possible, we give analytic interpretations of our results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据