4.7 Review

Reproductive aging: biological pathways and potential interventive strategies

期刊

JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND GENOMICS
卷 50, 期 3, 页码 141-150

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgg.2022.07.002

关键词

Reproductive aging; Infertility; Oocytes; Sperm; Gamete quality

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reproductive aging is a natural process that occurs in both females and males, leading to fertility decline and detrimental effects on offspring. Factors such as oxidative stress, mitochondrial defects, telomere shortening, chromosome segregation errors, and genetic alterations contribute to reproductive aging. Understanding the biological pathways and implementing interventive strategies can help delay or rescue the aging phenotypes of reproduction.
Reproductive aging is a natural process conserved across species and is well-known in females. It shows age-related follicle depletion and reduction of oocyte quality, eventually causing reproductive senescence and menopause. Although reproductive aging in males is not well noticed as in females, it also causes infertility and has deleterious consequences on the offspring. Various factors have been suggested to contribute to reproductive aging, including oxidative stress, mitochondrial defects, telomere shortening, meiotic chromosome segregation errors and genetic alterations. With the increasing trend of pregnancy age, it is particularly crucial to find interventions to preserve or extend human fertility. Studies in humans and model organisms have provided insights into the biological pathways associated with reproductive aging, and a series of potential interventive strategies have been tested. Here, we review factors affecting reproductive aging in females and males and summarize interventive strategies that may help delay or rescue the aging phenotypes of reproduction.Copyright (c) 2022, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and Genetics Society of China. Published by Elsevier Limited and Science Press. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据