4.4 Article

Excellent energy storage performance in NaNbO3-based relaxor antiferroeic ceramics under a low electric field

期刊

JOURNAL OF ELECTROCERAMICS
卷 48, 期 4, 页码 198-206

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10832-022-00283-w

关键词

NaNbO3; Energy storage; Relaxor antiferroelectric; Low electric field

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51902111]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, 0.88Na(Nb1-xTax)O-3-0.12Bi(0.2)Sr(0.7)TiO(3) antiferroelectric ceramics were synthesized with the addition of Ta, leading to reduced hysteresis loss and residual polarization. This resulted in a large recoverable energy storage density and high energy storage efficiency. The doped ceramics also exhibited excellent temperature stability.
NaNbO3-based antiferroelectric (AFE) ceramics have the prominent advantages of stable performance and low cost. However, its energy storage property is often remarkably limited by the hysteresis of the antiferroelectric to ferroelectric phase transformation. In this work, 0.88Na(Nb1-xTax)O-3-0.12Bi(0.2)Sr(0.7)TiO(3) (x=0-0.075) antiferroelectric ceramics were synthesized using a conventional mixed oxide route. Ta5+ were completely dissolved into the lattice of 0.88NaNbO(3 )-0.12Bi(0.2)Sr(0.7)TiO(3) to form a pure perovskite structure. With increased Ta content, the AFE orthogonal P phase was replaced by AFE orthogonal R phase progressively. Meanwhile, the dielectric constant curve showed relaxor-like properties. As a result, slender P-E curves with reduced hysteresis loss and decreased residual polarization were achieved. Interestingly, a large recoverable energy storage density (W-rec similar to 2.16 J cm(-3)) and high energy storage efficiency (eta similar to 80.7%) were obtained simultaneously under a low driving electric field of 15 kV mm(-1) at doping ratio (x) of 0.075. In addition, the 0.88Na(Nb0.0925Ta0.075)O-3-0.12Bi(0.2)Sr(0.7)TiO(3) sample exhibited excellent temperature stability, indicating an ideal candidate in future pulsed power capacitor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据