4.7 Article

Dynamic analysis of a plant-water model with spatial diffusion

期刊

JOURNAL OF DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
卷 329, 期 -, 页码 395-430

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jde.2022.05.009

关键词

Plant-water model; Turing-Hopf bifurcation; Normal form; Bistable state

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFE0109600]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [42075029, 11971143]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigates the spatiotemporal dynamics of a diffusive plant-water model in an arid flat environment and finds that the system exhibits Turing-Hopf bifurcation properties. By analyzing the normal form theory of reaction-diffusion equations, the study reveals that tiny changes in parameters can induce the switch between different states, including uniform state, time periodic state, spatially inhomogeneous steady state, and spatially inhomogeneous periodic state.
Vegetation pattern is one of the typical features in arid or semi-arid areas and thus revealing the mechanism of vegetation evolution is helpful to understand the behavior of ecosystem. To this end, we investigate the spatiotemporal dynamics of a diffusive plant-water model in an arid flat environment in this paper. By carrying out bifurcation analysis, we find that the system has the properties of Turing-Hopf bifurcation. Based on the normal form theory of reaction-diffusion equations, the dynamics of the diffusive plant-water model in the neighbourhood of the Turing-Hopf bifurcation point are exactly analyzed. Our results show that tiny changes of parameters can induce the switch of four different states including uniform state, time periodic state, spatially inhomogeneous steady state and spatially inhomogeneous periodic state. Moreover, there are different types of bistable phenomenon between desert state and other states, which will provide some insights into that whether ecosystems are vulnerable. (C) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据