4.7 Article

Highly selective electrocatalytic hydrogenation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural to 2,5-dihydroxymethylfuran over AgCu nanoalloys

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 47, 期 67, 页码 28904-28914

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.06.211

关键词

5-Hydroxymethylfurfural; 5-Dihydroxymethylfuran; Electrocatalytic hydrogenation; AgCu alloy; Alginic acid sodium

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22090034, U20A20151, 21776215]
  2. haihe Lboratory of Sustainable Chemical Transformations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrochemical reactions are an important method for reducing the carbon footprint of chemical processes. The study found that under mild conditions, AgCu nanoalloys supported by pyrolyzed biomass alginic acid sodium (PA) can selectively convert 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) to 2,5-dihydroxymethylfuran (DHMF) with outstanding performance.
Electrochemical reactions are important method for reducing the carbon footprint of large-scale chemical processes. Highly selective conversion of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) to 2,5-dihydroxymethylfuran (DHMF) is achieved under mild conditions through electro-catalytic hydrogenation (ECH) over AgCu nanoalloys supported by the pyrolyzed biomass alginic acid sodium (PA), with the advantage of utilizing the active hydrogen intermediates in the process. The Ag1Cu1/PA exhibits outstanding performance in ECH of HMF with a selectivity of 94% toward DHMF at a conversion of 93.2% and the Faraday efficiency (FE) of 61.8%, which are significantly superior to those over Ag/PA (selectivity of 53.89%, conversion of 90.6%, and FE 25.79%). The incorporation of Cu into Ag nanoparticles boosts the charge transferability and lowers the onset potential of ECH. Density functional theory calculations reveal that AgCu alloy provides more electron transfer to HMF and lowers the energy barrier for HMF hydrogenation. (C) 2022 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据