4.7 Article

Iron Limitation Drives the Globally Extreme Fluorescence/Chlorophyll Ratios of the Southern Ocean

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 49, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2021GL097616

关键词

phytoplankton fluorescence; BGC-Argo; chlorophyll; fluorometer; Southern Ocean; iron limitation

资金

  1. Australian Government as part of the Antarctic Science Collaboration Initiative program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ratio between fluorescence and chlorophyll-a varies in the world's oceans, with the highest ratios and variability observed in the Southern Ocean. In addition to species composition and chlorophyll packaging, iron limitation also plays a significant role in influencing this ratio. This study utilized radiometry data from BGC-Argo floats in the Southern Ocean to estimate chlorophyll concentration based on the light attenuation coefficient, revealing a positive correlation between fluorescence/chlorophyll ratio and a proxy for iron limitation.
The ratio between fluorescence (F) and chlorophyll-a (Chl)-where fluorescence is measured with a saturating fluorometer-is variable in the world's oceans, with the highest ratios and highest variability observed in the Southern Ocean. While species composition and Chl packaging per cell are strong drivers for the observed variability, additional factors, including iron limitation, have to this date not specifically been evaluated. Radiometers on biogeochemical (BGC)-Argo floats allow for an independent estimate of Chl concentration that is based on the light attenuation coefficient, K-d. Making use of 4,000 radiometry profiles from BGC-Argo floats in the Southern Ocean, we estimate Chl based on K-d and investigate the variability in F/Chl. Our analysis reveals a positive correlation between F/Chl and a proxy for iron limitation based on non-photochemical quenching dynamics. The strong influence of iron limitation on F/Chl is further corroborated by data from Southern Ocean phytoplankton cultures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据