4.7 Article

Observations of Blue Corona Discharges in Thunderclouds

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 49, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2022GL099064

关键词

atmospheric lightning; blue discharges; overshooting top; convection

资金

  1. Independent Research Fund Denmark [1026-00420B]
  2. ESA
  3. ESA PRODEX contracts [4000115884, 4000123438]
  4. national grant of Denmark
  5. national grant of Norway
  6. national grant of Spain

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Blue electric streamer discharges in the upper reaches of thunderclouds are observed with two different rise time distributions, one closely associated with cloud tops and relatively unaffected by cloud scattering, and the other originating from deeper within the clouds. Shallow events are more likely to have overshooting tops compared to deeper events. Additionally, both shallow and deeper events have higher Convective Available Potential Energy than lightning cells, indicating a strong convective environment preference for these discharges.
Blue electric streamer discharges in the upper reaches of thunderclouds are observed as flashes of 337.0 nm (blue) with faint or no emissions of 777.4 nm (red). Analyzing 3 years of measurements by the Atmosphere-Space Interactions Monitor on the International Space Station, we find that their distribution in rise time falls into two categories. One with fast rise times of 30 mu s or less that are relatively unaffected by cloud scattering and emanate from within similar to 2 km of the cloud tops, and another with longer rise times from deeper within the clouds. 50% of cells generating shallow events are associated with overshooting tops compared to 34% of cells generating deeper events. The median Convective Available Potential Energy of the cells is similar to 70% higher for the shallow events and similar to 38% higher for the deeper events than for lightning cells, suggesting the discharges are favored by strongly convective environments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据