4.3 Article

The influence of natural photoperiod on seasonal torpor expression of two opportunistic marsupial hibernators

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00360-016-1031-z

关键词

Burramyidae; Cercartetus spp.; Environmental cue; Temporal organisation; Season; Non-invasive method

资金

  1. Australian Research Council
  2. University of New England
  3. Australian Wildlife Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many mammals use torpor throughout the year but the individual contributions of environmental variables to seasonal changes in torpor expression are often difficult to tease apart. In many mammals, torpor is most often used opportunistically in response to decreased ambient temperature (T-a) and food availability, but information on how seasonally changing photoperiod per se influences torpor patterns is scant. Therefore, we quantified patterns of torpor use in response to natural photoperiod in captive marsupial pygmy-possums held at near-constant T-a with a stable food supply over a period of 19 months. Western pygmy-possums (Cercartetus concinnus) and eastern pygmy-possums (C. nanus) used spontaneous torpor in every month of the year; in total we measured >1100 individual torpor bouts. Torpor bout duration was >60 % longer in winter than in summer and increased with decreasing day length for both species. Interestingly, the duration of torpor appeared to be adjusted at both the beginning and end of bouts because the time of entry into and rewarming from torpor relative to sunrise and sunset, respectively, changed with season. We propose that this reflects a synchronisation of torpor timing with foraging periods in the wild, which would enable animals to maintain a high body mass year-round by maximising both energy savings via torpor and energy input via food consumption. Our study suggests that photoperiod makes a significant contribution to the seasonal change in torpor bout duration of small hibernating mammals that use torpor throughout the year.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据