4.5 Review

Quality of Life in Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

期刊

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.07.051

关键词

Chronic limb threatening ischaemia; Critical limb ischaemia; Peripheral arterial disease; Quality of life; Systematic review

资金

  1. Australian Commonwealth Government Research Training Program Scholarship
  2. Royal Australasian College of Surgeons

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of revascularization, major lower extremity amputation (MLEA), and conservative management (CM) in patients with chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI) by assessing the temporal changes in quality of life (QoL). The findings suggested that revascularization may provide modest QoL benefits, while MLEA or CM can maintain QoL. However, the certainty of evidence is generally low and further standardization of QoL studies is needed.
Objective: To assess the comparative effectiveness and temporal changes in quality of life (QoL) outcomes after revascularisation, major lower extremity amputation (MLEA), and conservative management (CM) in chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI). Data Sources: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Web of Science. Review Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed on QoL measured by any QoL instrument in adult patients with CLTI after open surgery (OS), endovascular intervention (EVI), MLEA, or CM. Randomised controlled trials and prospective observational studies published in any language between 1 January 1990 and 21 May 2021 were included. There was a pre-specified measurement time point of six months. Random effects meta-analysis was conducted on total scores for each QoL instrument. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations approach (PROSPERO registration: CRD42021253953). Results: Fifty-five studies with 8 909 patients were included. There was significant heterogeneity in the methods used to measure QoL, and the study characteristics. In particular, 14 different QoL instruments were used with various combinations of disease specific and generic instruments within each study. A narrative summary is therefore presented. Comparative effectiveness data showed there was reasonable certainty that QoL was similar between OS and EVI at six months. Temporal outcomes suggested small to moderate improvements in QOL six months after OS and EVI compared with baseline. Limited data indicated that QoL can be maintained or slightly improved after MLEA or CM. Treatment effects were overestimated owing to small study effects, selective non-reporting, attrition, and survivorship bias. Conclusion: QoL after OS and EVI appears to be similar. Revascularisation may provide modest QoL benefits, while MLEA or CM can maintain QoL. However, certainty of evidence is generally low or very low, and interpretation is hampered by significant heterogeneity. There is a need for a CLTI specific QoL instrument and methodological standardisation in QoL studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据