4.7 Article

Hydrogen-assisted failure in partially recrystallized carbon alloyed equiatomic CoCrFeMnNi high-entropy alloy

期刊

CORROSION SCIENCE
卷 203, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2022.110357

关键词

Hydrogen embrittlement; High-entropy alloys; Hydrogen induced twinning; Microstructure

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52071014]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [FRF-MP-20-51, FRF-BD-20-28A2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the hydrogen-assisted failure behavior of partially recrystallized carbon alloyed equiatomic CoCrFeMnNi high-entropy alloys was investigated. Microstructural evolution near the crack initiation sites and propagation pathways was observed, showing that fracture of samples in the presence of hydrogen was mainly dominated by localized plastic deformation. The study also revealed the formation of hydrogen-enhanced nanotwinning and nanovoids during tensile deformation, as well as stress assisted intergranular and transgranular cracking in hydrogen-charged samples caused by slip localization at boundaries. The presence of non-recrystallized zones and nanotwins was found to increase the resistance to hydrogen embrittlement.
We investigated the hydrogen-assisted failure behavior of partially recrystallized carbon alloyed equiatomic CoCrFeMnNi high-entropy alloys. Microstructural evolution in the vicinity of the crack initiation sites and propagation pathways was observed. The results showed that fracture of the samples in the presence of hydrogen was dominated by localized plastic deformation. Hydrogen enhanced nanotwinning and the formation of nanovoids were observed during tensile deformation. Furthermore, stress assisted intergranular and trans granular cracking in hydrogen-charged samples was caused by slip localization at boundaries. Observations confirmed that the resistance to hydrogen embrittlement was increased by the presence of non-recrystallized zones and nanotwins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据