4.6 Article

Regulating Extra-Framework Cations in Faujasite Zeolites for Capture of Trace Carbon Dioxide

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 28, 期 50, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.202201659

关键词

CO2 capture; extra-framework cations; faujasite; structure; structure-performance relationship

资金

  1. National Natural Science Funds of China [22121005, 22025203]
  2. Haihe Laboratory of Sustainable Chemical Transformations, Tianjin
  3. EPSRC [EP/V056409]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of cost-effective sorbents for direct capture of trace CO2 from the atmosphere is an important task. Commercial faujasite zeolites show promising performance in capturing trace CO2, and the extra-framework cations play a key role in their performance. In-situ solid-state NMR spectroscopy, synchrotron X-ray diffraction, and neutron diffraction reveal the binding sites for CO2 in these zeolites.
The development of cost-effective sorbents for direct capture of trace CO2 (<1 %) from the atmosphere is an important and challenging task. Natural or commercial zeolites are promising sorbents, but their performance in adsorption of trace CO2 has been poorly explored to date. A systematic study on capture of trace CO2 by commercial faujasite zeolites reveals that the extra-framework cations play a key role on their performance. Under dry conditions, Ba-X displays high dynamic uptake of 1.79 and 0.69 mmol g(-1) at CO2 concentrations of 10000 and 1000 ppm, respectively, and shows excellent recyclability in the temperature-swing adsorption processes. K-X exhibits perfect moisture resistance, and >95 % dry CO2 uptake can be preserved under relative humidity of 74 %. In situ solid-state NMR spectroscopy, synchrotron X-ray diffraction and neutron diffraction reveal two binding sites for CO2 in these zeolites, namely the basic framework oxygen atoms and the divalent alkaline earth metal ions. This study unlocks the potential of low-cost natural zeolites for applications in direct air capture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据