4.8 Article

Single-Cell Transcriptome Profiling Reveals Intratumoral Heterogeneity and Molecular Features of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 82, 期 18, 页码 3236-3248

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-22-0090

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [21H02721]
  2. research grant from SGH Foundation
  3. MSD Life Science Foundation
  4. [21K15562]
  5. [20J01794]
  6. [16H06279]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Single-cell transcriptomic profiling of DCIS reveals heterogeneity and molecular features, providing new insights into breast cancer biology and identifying potential therapeutic targets and diagnostic biomarkers.
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a precursor to invasive breast cancer. The frequency of DCIS is increasing because of routine mammography; however, the biological features and intratumoral heterogeneity of DCIS remain obscure. To address this deficiency, we performed single-cell transcriptomic profiling of DCIS and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). DCIS was found to be composed of several transcriptionally distinct subpopu-lations of cancer cells with specific functions. Several tran-scripts, including long noncoding RNAs, were highly expressed in IDC compared with DCIS and might be related to the invasive phenotype. Closeness centrality analysis revealed extensive het-erogeneity in DCIS, and the prediction model for cell-to-cell interactions implied that the interaction network among luminal cells and immune cells in DCIS was comparable with that in IDC. In addition, transcriptomic profiling of HER2 thorn luminal DCIS indicated HER2 genomic amplification at the DCIS stage. These data provide novel insight into the intratumoral hetero-geneity and molecular features of DCIS, which exhibit properties similar to IDC. Significance: Investigation of the molecular features of ductal carcinoma in situ at single cell resolution provides new insights into breast cancer biology and identifies candidate therapeutic targets and diagnostic biomarkers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据