4.4 Article

Biphenyl-degrading Bacteria Isolation with Laser Induced Visualized Ejection Separation Technology and Traditional Colony Sorting

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00128-022-03574-8

关键词

Biphenyl; Bacterial enrichment; Single cell sorting; Single colony sorting; Precise sorter; Degradation verification

资金

  1. Science and Technology Foundation of Zhejiang Province, China [2021C03167]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21876149, 42077125]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, biphenyl was used as a carbon source to enrich microorganisms from PCB-contaminated paddy soil samples. The taxonomic structures of the soil samples and enrichments were analyzed using high-throughput sequencing. It was found that the microbial community can undergo significant changes through enrichment from generation to generation. Additionally, a new technology called LIVEST was shown to be a more efficient and targeted method for microbial resource exploration.
In this work, biphenyl was used as carbon source to enrich microorganisms from polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)-contaminated paddy soil samples, and the taxonomic structures in both of the soil samples and the fourth-generation enrichments were examined with high-throughput sequencing. Single cells were isolated from the enrichments via single cell sorting technology named Laser Induced Visualized Ejection Separation Technology (LIVEST) and also traditional single colony sorting, and the genera of the isolates were identified using 16S rRNA sequencing. The results from high-throughput sequencing present that enrichment from generation to generation can considerably change the microbial community. Comparing the two sorting methods, the LIVEST is more time-saving and cell-targeted for microbial resource exploration. Based on the further verification of biphenyl degradation, it was found that some strains belonging to genera Macrococcus, Aerococcus and Metabacillus are capable in degrading biphenyl, which have not been reported yet.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据