4.8 Article

Removal of tetracycline by aerobic granular sludge from marine aquaculture wastewater: A molecular dynamics investigation

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 355, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127286

关键词

Saline wastewater; Aerobic granular sludge; Tetracycline removal; Molecular dynamics simulation; Adsorption mechanism

资金

  1. Science and Technology Development Fund, Macau SAR [0020/2021/ITP, 0104/2018/A3]
  2. Research Committee of University of Macau [MYRG2020-00148-FST, MYRG2019-00045-FST]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mechanism of biological removal of tetracycline from marine aquaculture wastewater was investigated using experiments and molecular dynamics simulations. It was found that electrostatic attraction played a significant role in tetracycline adsorption on microbial cell membrane. The presence of sodium ions in seawater decreased the interaction between tetracycline and the cell membrane.
Although biological treatment of marine aquaculture wastewater is promising, the fundamental principles driving the adsorption of tetracycline to microbial cell membrane are not well understood. Using a combination of experiments and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, the mechanism underlying the biological removal of tetracycline from seawater was investigated. More than 90% tetracycline removal was achieved in an aerobic granular sludge system, with degradation accounting for 30% of total removal. A model of the tetracyclinedipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine lipid bilayers was established to elucidate the transport mechanism of tetracycline from bulk solution to microorganisms' cell membrane. 62% of the driving force for tetracycline adsorption on the cell membrane originated from electrostatic attraction. The electrophilic groups on tetracycline (amino and aromatic groups) were attracted to the phosphate groups in the cell membrane. Sodium ions, which are abundant in seawater, decreased the interaction energy between tetracycline and the cell membrane.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据