4.7 Article

How to avoid misinterpretation of dual reporter gene assay data affected by cell damage

期刊

ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY
卷 96, 期 9, 页码 2501-2510

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00204-022-03323-0

关键词

Pregnane x receptor; Reporter gene assay; Cytotoxicity; Firefly; Renilla

资金

  1. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH Co.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study describes idealized models for dual PXR reporter gene assays and their key features, and provides guidance to avoid experimental errors and misinterpretation of data. Experimental data support these models and highlight the importance of considering drug concentration limits, observing changes in Renilla luminescence, and evaluating the relationship between PXR activity, proliferation, and fluorescence signals.
The activity of nuclear receptors (e.g., pregnane x receptor, PXR) can be assessed by luminescence-based dual reporter gene assays. Under most conditions, receptor-activated firefly luminescence is normalized to Renilla luminescence, which is triggered by a constitutively active promoter. Simultaneous damage to the cells can however disrupt these signals and thus impair the interpretation of the data. Consequently, this study addressed three important aspects: First, idealized models were described, each highlighting crucial characteristics and important pitfalls of dual PXR reporter gene assays used to evaluate PXR activation or inhibition. Second, these models were supported by experimental data obtained with a strong PXR activator (rifampicin) with low cytotoxicity, a PXR activator with high cytotoxicity (dovitinib), a proposed PXR inhibitor that reportedly has no toxic effects (triptolide), and a cytotoxic control (oxaliplatin). Data were evaluated for relative PXR activity data, individual firefly or Renilla luminescence, and anti-proliferative effects of the compounds (assessed by crystal violet staining). Finally, a step-by-step guide is proposed to avoid misleading set-up of the assay or misinterpretation of the data obtained. Key considerations here include (1) omission of drug concentrations beyond 10-20% proliferation inhibition; (2) observation of Renilla luminescence, because this tends to indicate 'false PXR activation' when it inexplicably decreases; (3) parallel decrease of relative PXR activity and proliferation below baseline levels in conjunction with a sharp decrease in Renilla luminescence indicates 'false PXR antagonism'; (4) non-sigmoidal relationships suggest the absence of concentration dependency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据