4.7 Article

The kinectome: A comprehensive kinematic map of human motion in health and disease

期刊

ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
卷 1516, 期 1, 页码 247-261

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nyas.14860

关键词

gait analysis; movement pattern; network; Parkinson's disease

资金

  1. SNSF Ambizione [PZ00P2_185716]
  2. Bando Ricerca Competitiva 2017 [D.R. 289/2017]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PZ00P2_185716] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article introduces a new method for studying human movement, representing it as a network and using network science to extract relevant features for understanding the physiology and pathophysiology of movement.
Human voluntary movement stems from the coordinated activations in space and time of many musculoskeletal segments. However, the current methodological approaches to study human movement are still limited to the evaluation of the synergies among a few body elements. Network science can be a useful approach to describe movement as a whole and to extract features that are relevant to understanding both its complex physiology and the pathophysiology of movement disorders. Here, we propose to represent human movement as a network (that we named the kinectome), where nodes represent body points, and edges are defined as the correlations of the accelerations between each pair of them. We applied this framework to healthy individuals and patients with Parkinson's disease, observing that the patients' kinectomes display less symmetrical patterns as compared to healthy controls. Furthermore, we used the kinectomes to successfully identify both healthy and diseased subjects using short gait recordings. Finally, we highlighted topological features that predict the individual clinical impairment in patients. Our results define a novel approach to study human movement. While deceptively simple, this approach is well-grounded, and represents a powerful tool that may be applied to a wide spectrum of frameworks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据