3.8 Article

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement-Associated Infective Endocarditis: Comparison of Early, Intermediate, and Late-Onset Cases

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.shj.2022.100005

关键词

Echocardiography; Infective endocarditis; PET; CT imaging; TAVR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study revealed that most cases of TAVR-IE had an intermediate onset, with Staphylococcus aureus being the most common organism, highlighting the prognostic implications of understanding the timing of TAVR-IE.
Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement-associated infective endocarditis (TAVR-IE) is a relatively rare complication of TAVR. Little is known about the characteristics of early, intermediate, and late-onset TAVRIE. Methods: We studied the risk factors, microbiological patterns, and diagnostic and treatment strategies in patients with early (<60 days), intermediate (60-365 days), and late-onset (>1 year) TAVR-IE. Results: Ten out of 494 definite cases of prosthetic valve IE between 2007 and 2019 were confirmed to have TAVRIE from the IE registry at our center. The mean age was 78.1 +/- 13.7 years, with 50% being female. The mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score was 7.8 +/- 5.7. Most (60%) TAVR-IE cases had an intermediate onset, with Staphylococcus aureus being the most common organism (66.6%). 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography aided in diagnosis of TAVR-IE in 20% of cases. Mortality due to IE was observed in 40% of cases. Most of the patients underwent conservative management, and 37.5% survived over a mean follow-up of 709 +/- 453 days. Two patients underwent surgery, of whom one died on day 30 postoperatively from sepsis. Mortality due to IE occurred in 25% of cases in the early and intermediate-onset groups, while there was 100% mortality in the late-onset group. Conclusions: In a single-center cohort, most TAVR-IE cases had an intermediate onset, with Staphylococcus aureus being the most common organism. Understanding timing of TAVR-IE may have important prognostic implications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据