4.7 Review

ACTH Stimulation Tests for the Diagnosis of Adrenal Insufficiency: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2015-1700

关键词

-

资金

  1. Endocrine Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: The diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency is clinically challenging and often requires ACTH stimulation tests. Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the high- (250 mcg) and low- (1 mcg) dose ACTH stimulation tests in the diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency. Methods: We searched six databases through February 2014. Pairs of independent reviewers selected studies and appraised the risk of bias. Diagnostic association measures were pooled across studies using a bivariate model. Data Synthesis: For secondary adrenal insufficiency, we included 30 studies enrolling 1209 adults and 228 children. High-and low-dose ACTH stimulation tests had similar diagnostic accuracy in adults and children using different peak serum cortisol cutoffs. In general, both tests had low sensitivity and high specificity resulting in reasonable likelihood ratios for a positive test (adults: high dose, 9.1; low dose, 5.9; children: high dose, 43.5; low dose, 7.7), but a fairly suboptimal likelihood ratio for a negative test (adults: high dose, 0.39; low dose, 0.19; children: high dose, 0.65; low dose, 0.34). For primary adrenal insufficiency, we included five studies enrolling 100 patients. Data were only available to estimate the sensitivity of high dose ACTH stimulation test (92%; 95% confidence interval, 81-97%). Conclusion: Both high-and low-dose ACTH stimulation tests had similar diagnostic accuracy. Both tests are adequate to rule in, but not rule out, secondary adrenal insufficiency. Our confidence in these estimates is low to moderate because of the likely risk of bias, heterogeneity, and imprecision.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Association of study design features and treatment effects in trials of chronic medical conditions: a meta-epidemiological study

Zhen Wang, Fares Alahdab, Magdoleen Farah, Mohamed Seisa, Mohammed Firwana, Rami Rajjoub, Samer Saadi, Tabinda Jawaid, Tarek Nayfeh, Mohammad Hassan Murad

Summary: This meta-epidemiological study found that lack of blinding of patients and study personnel was associated with a larger treatment effect in randomized controlled trials evaluating therapies for chronic medical conditions. However, there was no statistically significant association with other risk of bias indicators.

BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (2022)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature series on social media (part 1): how to interpret healthcare information available on platforms

Ryan S. D'Souza, Lubna Daraz, W. Michael Hooten, Gordon Guyatt, Mohammad Hassan Murad

BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (2022)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature series on social media (part 2): how to appraise studies using data from platforms

Ryan S. D'Souza, Lubna Daraz, W. Michael Hooten, Gordon Guyatt, Mohammad Hassan Murad

BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (2022)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Community Health Needs Assessment Data and Community Recovery From COVID-19

Robin G. Molella, Angela L. Murad, Meaghan Sherden, Derrick J. Fritz, Emily N. Sadecki, Graham Briggs, Zhen Wang, M. Hassan Murad

Summary: This study compared the health outcomes of community residents before and after the pandemic through a mid-cycle survey. The results showed a decrease in well-being, an increase in substance use, and financial stress among community residents since the beginning of the pandemic.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2022)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Thresholds for interpreting the fragility index derived from sample of randomised controlled trials in cardiology: a meta-epidemiologic study

Mohammad Hassan Murad, Abdalla Kara Balla, Muhammad Shahzeb Khan, Asim Shaikh, Samer Saadi, Zhen Wang

Summary: The fragility index (FI) is a useful measure for assessing the robustness of statistically significant results. This study identified a range of FI values (19-22) that can indicate the precision of treatment effects, providing a rule of thumb for evaluating the stability of treatment outcomes.

BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (2023)

Article Pharmacology & Pharmacy

A Bayesian model for combining standardized mean differences and odds ratios in the same meta-analysis

Yaqi Jing, Mohammad Hassan Murad, Lifeng Lin

Summary: This article proposes a Bayesian hierarchical model to synthesize different types of study results. The Bayesian method generally produces more accurate results compared to the conventional conversion method. However, the Bayesian method relies on the normality assumption for continuous measures and may lead to biases for non-normal data.

JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS (2023)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Proof of concept: all-virtual guideline development workshops using GRADE during the COVID-19 pandemic

Madelin R. Siedler, M. Hassan Murad, Rebecca L. Morgan, Yngve Falck-Ytter, Reem A. Mustafa, Shahnaz Sultan, Philipp Dahm

BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (2023)

Review Endocrinology & Metabolism

Treatment of Hypercalcemia of Malignancy in Adults: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline

Ghada El-Hajj Fuleihan, Gregory A. Clines, Mimi Hu, Claudio Marcocci, M. Hassan Murad, Thomas Piggott, Catherine Van Poznak, Joy Y. Wu, Matthew T. Drake

Summary: Hypercalcemia of malignancy (HCM) is a common complication of malignancies, but its incidence may be decreasing. Despite the availability of effective medications, there are no evidence-based recommendations for managing HCM. A panel of experts developed guidelines for the treatment of adults with HCM, recommending the use of denosumab or intravenous bisphosphonate. Treatment of the primary malignancy is crucial for controlling HCM.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM (2023)

Article Endocrinology & Metabolism

Management of Individuals With Diabetes at High Risk for Hypoglycemia: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline

Anthony L. McCall, David C. Lieb, Roma Gianchandani, Heidemarie MacMaster, Gregory A. Maynard, M. Hassan Murad, Elizabeth Seaquist, Joseph Wolfsdorf, Robin Fein Wright, Wojtek Wiercioch

Summary: This study reviewed and updated the management of hypoglycemia in people with diabetes, aiming to reduce and prevent it. A multidisciplinary panel of experts identified 10 clinical questions and made 10 recommendations. These recommendations can be used to inform clinical practice and improve healthcare systems, as hypoglycemia is an important complication for people with diabetes.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM (2023)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Integrating Infectious Diseases and Preventive Medicine Specialties Into 1 Division: Experience of an Academic Medical Center

M. Hassan Murad, Melanie D. Swift, Raymund R. Razonable, Aaron J. Tande, John W. Wilson, Mary J. Kasten, Irene G. Sia, Jennifer N. Matey, Greg Vanichkachorn, Natalie A. Caine, Vijay Shah, Jack O'Horo, Molly J. Destro Borgen, Clayton T. Cowl, Elie F. Berbari

MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS (2023)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Different meta-analysis methods can change judgements about imprecision of effect estimates: a meta-epidemiological study

Zhen Wang, Muayad A. Alzuabi, Rebecca L. Morgan, Reem A. Mustafa, Yngve Falck-Ytter, Philipp Dahm, Shahnaz Sultan, Mohammad Hassan Murad

Summary: This study empirically evaluated five commonly used meta-analysis methods and their impact on imprecision judgements about effect estimates. The results showed that different pooling methods led to different conclusions about the precision of effect estimates, particularly when the number of studies was small and statistical heterogeneity was substantial. Therefore, sensitivity analyses using multiple methods may be necessary in these two scenarios.

BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (2023)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Methods for deriving risk difference (absolute risk reduction) from a meta-analysis

M. Hassan Murad, Zhen Wang, Ye Zhu, Samer Saadi, Haitao Chu, Lifeng Lin

Summary: Trading off benefits and harms requires knowledge of the absolute risk reduction or risk difference, making risk difference a critical measure for decision making. However, estimating risk difference is not straightforward and the available methods have various limitations. This article discusses four methods for estimating risk difference and provides recommendations on when to use each approach.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2023)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Proposed triggers for retiring a living systematic review

Mohammad Hassan Murad, Zhen Wang, Haitao Chu, Lifeng Lin, Ibrahim K. El Mikati, Joanne Khabsa, Elie Akl, Robby Nieuwlaat, Holger J. Schuenemann, Irbaz Bin Riaz

Summary: Living systematic reviews (LSRs) are continuously updated reviews that incorporate new evidence as it becomes available. It is important to determine when to retire LSRs from the living mode, and we propose triggers for making that decision. The first trigger is retiring LSRs when there is conclusive evidence for decision-making. The second trigger is retiring LSRs when the question becomes less pertinent for decision-making or when resources are unavailable.

BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (2023)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

GRADE guidance 38: updated guidance for rating up certainty of evidence due to a dose-response gradient

M. Hassan Murad, Jos Verbeek, Lukas Schwingshackl, Tommaso Filippini, Marco Vinceti, Elie A. Akl, Rebecca L. Morgan, Reem A. Mustafa, Dena Zeraatkar, Emily Senerth, Renee Street, Lifeng Lin, Yngve Falck-Ytter, Gordon Guyatt, Holger J. Schunemann

Summary: This article discusses the impact of dose-response gradients on the certainty of evidence in intervention and exposure studies. By determining the credibility of the gradient and applying the gradient domain, ratings can be increased.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2023)

Review Infectious Diseases

Early switch to oral antibiotic therapy for the treatment of patients with bacterial native vertebral osteomyelitis: a quaternary center experience, systematic review, and meta-analysis

Matteo Passerini, Julian Maamari, Tarek Nayfeh, Leslie C. Hassett, Aaron J. Tande, Mohammad H. Murad, Zelalem Temesgen, Elie F. Berbari

Summary: This study assessed the efficacy of an early switch to oral therapy in bacterial native vertebral osteomyelitis and found that the current evidence is insufficient to support routine recommendation of early switch.

JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT INFECTION (2022)

暂无数据