4.7 Article

On Anomalous Ocean Heat Transport toward the Arctic and Associated Climate Predictability

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLIMATE
卷 29, 期 2, 页码 689-704

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0448.1

关键词

Circulation; Dynamics; Atmosphere-ocean interaction; Ocean circulation; Physical Meteorology and Climatology; Climate prediction; Models and modeling; Climate models; Variability; Decadal variability

资金

  1. Centre for Climate Dynamics at the Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research through the project PRACTICE
  2. Research Council of Norway project EPOCASA
  3. Research Council of Norway project NORTH

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A potential for climate predictability is rooted in anomalous ocean heat transport and its consequent influence on the atmosphere above. Here the propagation, drivers, and atmospheric impact of heat anomalies within the northernmost limb of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation are assessed using a multicentury climate model simulation. Consistent with observation-based inferences, simulated heat anomalies propagate from the eastern subpolar North Atlantic into and through the Nordic seas. The dominant time scale of associated climate variability in the northern seas is 14 years, including that of observed sea surface temperature and modeled ocean heat content, air-sea heat flux, and surface air temperature. A heat budget analysis reveals that simulated ocean heat content anomalies are driven by poleward ocean heat transport, primarily related to variable volume transport. The ocean's influence on the atmosphere, and hence regional climate, is manifested in the model by anomalous ocean heat convergence driving subsequent changes in surface heat fluxes and surface air temperature. The documented northward propagation of thermohaline anomalies in the northern seas and their consequent imprint on the regional atmosphereincluding the existence of a common decadal time scale of variabilitydetail a key aspect of eventual climate predictability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据