4.7 Article

An uncertainty analysis of subsidy for carbon capture and storage (CCS) retrofitting investment in China's coal power plants using a real-options approach

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 137, 期 -, 页码 200-212

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.074

关键词

Real option model; Uncertainty analysis; CCS retrofitting investment; Carbon market; Subsidy for electricity generation; China's coal power plants

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71273153, 71525007]
  2. National Science and Technology Support Program [2013BAK15B01]
  3. Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) Fund of China [2014036]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is an attractive option to help reduce China's carbon emission. This paper analyzes the impacts of subsidy for electricity generation on CCS retrofitting investment and carbon abatement in China's coal power plants, considering the coaction of carbon market and subsidy policy. To this end, this paper builds up a real option model, considering carbon prices, electricity prices and coal prices' uncertainties. For decision of CCS investment, we consider two important aspects: whether to invest and when to invest, i.e. CCS investment's potential and timing. Some major findings include: 1) The impacts of subsidy on CCS investment and carbon abatement are affected by carbon market conditions: initial carbon price can determine the magnitude of subsidy's impacts, while carbon prices' uncertainty level can determine subsidy's marginal impacts. 2) Subsidy from $0.01 to $0.05/kWh can raise CCS investment potential by 9.66%-39.18%, shorten CCS investment period by 0.39-1.95 years and bring carbon abatement potential of 0.10-1.89 GtCO(2), considering different carbon market conditions. 3) With the benchmark carbon market and affordable subsidies, triggered CCS investments in coal power plants have an economical-efficient carbon abatement potential up to 20% of China's carbon emission in 2030. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据