3.8 Article

Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting using GaN Nanowires with Reverse-Mesa Structures as Photoanode Material

期刊

出版社

KOREAN VACUUM SOC
DOI: 10.5757/ASCT.2022.31.2.51

关键词

Photoelectrochemical water splitting; GaN nanowire; Reverse-mesa structure; High crystallinity; Photoanode

资金

  1. National Research Foun-dation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [2018R1D1A1B07043442]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2018R1D1A1B07043442] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Improved photoelectrochemical water splitting using GaN nanowires with reverse-mesa structures as photoanode material is reported. The increase in the number of carriers participating in the reaction, along with the enhanced absorption rate and carrier separation efficiency, contribute to the improved performance.
We report improved photoelectrochemical water splitting (PEC-WS) using GaN nanowires (NWs) with reverse-mesa structures (RMNWs) formed on Si(111) as a photoanode material. The GaN-RMNW photoanode exhibited a current density of 2.62 mA/cm(2) and an applied photon-to-current efficiency of 1.65% at 0.6 V versus a reversible hydrogen electrode. These values are considerably higher than those (1.16 mA/cm(2) and 1.24%) of the photoanode based on GaN NWs with uniform hexagonal-pillar structures. The improved PEC-WS using the GaN-RMNW photoanode is attributed to the increase in the number of carriers participating in the PEC-WS reaction. The increase in the effective carriers is primarily due to the high crystallinity of the GaN RMNWs and the increase in the absorption rate of the incident light by the reverse-mesa structures. In addition, the energy-band structure between the GaN RMNWs and Si(111) promotes the separation of photogenerated carriers. Consequently, it reduces carrier recombination inside the photoanode, thereby enabling a high-performance PEC-WS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据