4.6 Article

A liquid chromatography-mass spectrometric method for the detection of cyclic β-amino fatty acid lipopeptides

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1438, 期 -, 页码 76-83

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2016.02.013

关键词

Lipopeptides; Bacteria; Cyanobacteria; LC-HRMS; Fatty acid; Peptide

资金

  1. Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic-National Programme of Sustainability I [LO1416]
  2. Czech Science Foundation [CSF 14-18067S, 16-09381S]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacterial lipopeptides, which contain beta-amino fatty acids, are an abundant group of bacterial secondary metabolites exhibiting antifungal and/or cytotoxic properties. Here we have developed an LC-HRMS/MS method for the selective detection of beta-amino fatty acid containing cyclic lipopeptides. The method was optimized using the lipopeptides iturin A and puwainaphycin F, which contain fatty acids of similar length but differ in the amino acid composition of the peptide cycle. Fragmentation energies of 10-55 eV were used to obtain the amino acid composition of the peptide macrocycle. However, fragmentation energies of 90-130 eV were used to obtain an intense fragment specific for the beta-amino fatty acid (CnH2n+2N+). The method allowed the number of carbons and consequently the length of the beta-amino fatty acid to be estimated. We identified 21 puwainaphycin variants differing in fatty acid chain in the crude extract of cyanobacterium Cylindrospermum alatosporum using this method. Analogously 11 iturin A variants were detected. The retention time of the lipopeptide variants showed a near perfect linear dependence (R-2=0.9995) on the length of the fatty acid chain in linear separation gradient which simplified the detection of minor variants. We used the method to screen 240 cyanobacterial strains and identified lipopeptides from 8 strains. The HPLC-HRMS/MS method developed here provides a rapid and easy way to detecting novel variants of cyclic lipopeptides. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据