4.0 Article

Perceived Normalization of Drug Trafficking and Adolescent Substance Use on the US-Mexico Border

期刊

JOURNAL OF DRUG ISSUES
卷 52, 期 3, 页码 421-433

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/00220426211046593

关键词

Adolescent substance use; US-Mexico border; drug trafficking; cross-border purchase of substances

资金

  1. Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Services Award
  2. National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health [1F31MD012435-01]
  3. Program in Migration and Health-California Endowment, UC Berkeley
  4. Center for Border Health Disparities, Arizona Health Sciences, University of Arizona

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adolescents residing on the US-Mexico border are at a higher risk for substance misuse due to environmental factors, and the perception of drug trafficking normalization is associated with increased cross-border purchase and substance use.
Adolescents residing on the US-Mexico border are at disproportionate risk for substance misuse due to environmental risk factors, including high unemployment, high concentration of liquor licenses, drug-trade-related violence, border militarization, and inadequate access to prevention, treatment, and support services for substance misuse. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine the association between high perceived normalization of drug trafficking and cross-border purchase, and past 30-day substance use (tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana) in a sample of 445 primarily Mexican American adolescents living on the US-Mexico border. Adolescents with higher perceived normalization of drug trafficking scores were more likely to have crossed the border to purchase (OR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.07, 1.28) and use substances (OR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.00, 1.17). The economic and normative environment of border communities must be considered in the formation of interventions targeted at substance use risk prevention and mitigation, and involve binational support from organizations, policy makers, and community members.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据