4.7 Article

Estimation of damped oscillation associated spectra from ultrafast transient absorption spectra

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 145, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4966196

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council [267333]
  2. NSERC Canada Graduate Scholarships
  3. University of Toronto
  4. European Union [654148]
  5. United States Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-13-1-0005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

When exciting a complex molecular system with a short optical pulse, all chromophores present in the system can be excited. The resulting superposition of electronically and vibrationally excited states evolves in time, which is monitored with transient absorption spectroscopy. We present a methodology to resolve simultaneously the contributions of the different electronically and vibrationally excited states from the complete data. The evolution of the excited states is described with a superposition of damped oscillations. The amplitude of a damped oscillation cos(omega(n)t) exp(-gamma(n)t) as a function of the detection wavelength constitutes a damped oscillation associated spectrum DOAS(n)(lambda) with an accompanying phase characteristic phi(n)(lambda). In a case study, the cryptophyte photosynthetic antenna complex PC612 which contains eight bilin chromophores was excited by a broadband optical pulse. Difference absorption spectra from 525 to 715 nm were measured until 1 ns. The population dynamics is described by four lifetimes, with interchromophore equilibration in 0.8 and 7.5 ps. We have resolved 24 DOAS with frequencies between 130 and 1649 cm(-1) and with damping rates between 0.9 and 12 ps(-1). In addition, 11 more DOAS with faster damping rates were necessary to describe the coherent artefact. The DOAS contains both ground and excited state features. Their interpretation is aided by DOAS analysis of simulated transient absorption signals resulting from stimulated emission and ground state bleach. (C) 2016 Author(s).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据