4.2 Article

Global and National Declines in Life Expectancy: An End-of-2021 Assessment

期刊

POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
卷 48, 期 1, 页码 31-50

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/padr.12477

关键词

-

资金

  1. California Center for Population Research at UCLA [P2C-HD041022]
  2. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article reports on the changes in global life expectancies from the available evidence at the end of 2021. The global life expectancy declined during the COVID-19 pandemic, but seemed to have stabilized in the last quarter of 2021. The decline in life expectancy between 2020 and 2021 was smaller, but it marked the first decline since 1950.
Timely, high-quality mortality data have allowed for assessments of the impact of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on life expectancies in upper-middle- and high-income countries. Extant data, though imperfect, suggest that the bulk of the pandemic-induced mortality might have occurred elsewhere. This article reports on changes in life expectancies around the world as far as they can be estimated from the evidence available at the end of 2021. The global life expectancy appears to have declined by 0.92 years between 2019 and 2020 and by another 0.72 years between 2020 and 2021, but the decline seems to have ended during the last quarter of 2021. Uncertainty about its exact size aside, this represents the first decline in global life expectancy since 1950, the first year for which a global estimate is available from the United Nations. Annual declines in life expectancy (from a 12-month period to the next) appear to have exceeded two years at some point before the end of 2021 in at least 50 countries. Since 1950, annual declines of that magnitude had only been observed on rare occasions, such as Cambodia in the 1970s, Rwanda in the 1990s, and possibly some sub-Saharan African nations at the peak of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) pandemic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据