4.6 Article

Analysis of neuron-astrocyte metabolic cooperation in the brain of db/db mice with cognitive decline using 13C NMR spectroscopy

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0271678X15626154

关键词

C-13 NMR; acetate; cognitive decline; diabetes; brain metabolism

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21175099, 21575105, 81501303]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation [LY13H070005, LY14H090014, LY15H180010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Type 2 diabetes has been linked to cognitive impairment, but its potential metabolic mechanism is still unclear. The present study aimed to explore neuron-astrocyte metabolic cooperation in the brain of diabetic (db/db, BKS. Cg-m(+/+) Leprdb/J) mice with cognitive decline using C-13 NMR technique in combination with intravenous [2-(CC)-C-13]-acetate and [3-(CC)-C-13]-lactate infusions. We found that the C-13-enrichment from [2-(CC)-C-13]-acetate into tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediate, succinate, was significantly decreased in db/db mice with cognitive decline compared with wild-type (WT, C57BLKS/J) mice, while an opposite result was obtained after [3-(CC)-C-13]-lactate infusion. Relative to WT mice, db/db mice with cognitive decline had significantly lower (CC)-C-13 labeling percentages in neurotransmitters including glutamine, glutamate, and g-aminobutyric acid after [2-(CC)-C-13]-acetate infusion. However, [3-(CC)-C-13]-lactate resulted in increased (CC)-C-13-enrichments in neurotransmitters in db/db mice with cognitive decline. This may indicate that the disturbance of neurotransmitter metabolism occurred during the development of cognitive decline. In addition, a reduction in (CC)-C-13-labeling of lactate and an increase in gluconeogenesis were found from both labeled infusions in db/db mice with cognitive decline. Therefore, our results suggest that the development of cognitive decline in type 2 diabetes may be implicated to an unbalanced metabolism in neuron-astrocyte cooperation and an enhancement of gluconeogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据