4.6 Article

KIR channels tune electrical communication in cerebral arteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
卷 37, 期 6, 页码 2171-2184

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0271678X16662041

关键词

Electrophysiology; endothelium; microcirculation; potassium channels; smooth muscle

资金

  1. Canadian Institute of Health Research
  2. Vanier scholarship
  3. AI-HS graduate studentship
  4. National Institute of Health [R21NS090129, R56NS096186]
  5. Alberta Innovates [201400205] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The conducted vasomotor response reflects electrical communication in the arterial wall and the distance signals spread is regulated by three factors including resident ion channels. This study defined the role of inward-rectifying K+ channels (K-IR) in governing electrical communication along hamster cerebral arteries. Focal KCl application induced a vasoconstriction that conducted robustly, indicative of electrical communication among cells. Inhibiting dominant K+ conductances had no attenuating effect, the exception being Ba2+ blockade of K-IR. Electrophysiology and Q-PCR analysis of smooth muscle cells revealed a Ba2+-sensitive K-IR current comprised of K(IR)2.1/2.2 subunits. This current was surprisingly small and when incorporated into a model, failed to account for the observed changes in conduction. We theorized a second population of K-IR channels exist and consistent with this idea, a robust Ba2+-sensitive K(IR)2.1/2.2 current was observed in endothelial cells. When both K-IR currents were incorporated into, and then inhibited in our model, conduction decay was substantive, aligning with experiments. Enhanced decay was ascribed to the rightward shift in membrane potential and the increased feedback arising from voltage-dependent-K+ channels. In summary, this study shows that two K-IR populations work collaboratively to govern electrical communication and the spread of vasomotor responses along cerebral arteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据