4.7 Article

Physiological and Biochemical Parameters of Leaves for Evaluation of the Potato Yield

期刊

AGRICULTURE-BASEL
卷 12, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agriculture12060757

关键词

Solanum tuberosum L.; arid climate; adaptation; morphological; physiological and biochemical parameters; yield

类别

资金

  1. [1021060107217-0-1.6.19]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the morphological, physiological, and biochemical parameters of potato leaves to evaluate yield. It found that different ripeness groups of potato varieties were affected differently by temperature and soil moisture. The findings are important for increasing productivity and improving potato quality.
The aim of the study was to investigate the morphological, physiological, and biochemical parameters of leaves to evaluate the yield of Solanum tuberosum L. We conducted 3-year experiments with 24 varieties of potatoes, differing in ripeness groups (early ripening, mid-early ripening and mid ripening). Plant height, linear dimensions, number of stomata per unit leaf area as well as content of pigments, proline, membrane lipids and proteins, and the level of lipid per oxidation in the leaves of each variety were investigated. A 3D modeling method showed the yield of early varieties negatively correlated with an increase in temperatures (R = -0.97). The soil moisture content positively correlated with the yield of medium-early varieties (R = 0.97). The soil moisture content and the tuber numbers in mid-season varieties had a negative correlation (R = -0.96). The regulation mechanisms of processes in cells depend on the ripening time of a variety. In order to increase productivity and to improve the potato quality, it is necessary to take into account the peculiarities of the regional climatic conditions and use the varieties of a certain ripening group. Our data refine the understanding of the relationship between the potato above-ground mass and the yield of tubers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据