4.5 Article

The Chinese medicinal plants rhizosphere: Metabolites, microorganisms, and interaction

期刊

RHIZOSPHERE
卷 22, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.rhisph.2022.100540

关键词

Medicinal plants; Rhizosphere; Root exudates; Microbe-plant interactions

资金

  1. Priority Academic Program Devel-opment of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD) [(20) 2030]
  2. Jiangsu Agriculture Science and Technology Innovation Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reviews the research progress on the interaction between medicinal plants, rhizospheric microorganisms, and root secretions, focusing on the effects of continuous cropping obstacles on the rhizospheric soil microbial community.
Rhizosphere is a hot spot for plant-microbe-soil information and material exchanges, and is inseparable from plant growth and development. The purpose of this paper is to review the progress of research concerning the rhizospheric microorganisms of medicinal plants, the types of root secretions and their interactions. The majority of medicinal plants have strong obstacles to continuous cropping, so we reviewed studies on the effects of root exudates and microbial communities in rhizosphere on continuous cropping obstacles. In the context of continuous cropping, medicinal plants secrete secondary metabolites in order to resist abiotic stress, which accumulate in the soil and produce autotoxic effects. These autotoxins have a concentration effect on medicinal plants; the higher the concentration, the stronger the inhibitory effect on growth. They are also highly species specific, with autotoxins differing from one medicinal plant to another. As a result of these autotoxins, the structure of the rhizospheric soil microbial community is destabilized, resulting in an increase in the number of harmful microorganisms and a decrease in the number of beneficial microorganisms. The present study provides an insight into the interactions between medicinal plants and rhizospheric microorganisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据