4.5 Article

ZO-1 interactions with F-actin and occludin direct epithelial polarization and single lumen specification in 3D culture

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 130, 期 1, 页码 243-259

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.188185

关键词

Cell polarity; Epithelial Cells; Tight junctions; Morphogenesis; Lumen Formation

资金

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [F30DK103511, F32DK094550, R01DK61931, R01DK68271]
  2. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [T32HD007009]
  3. Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute [P30CA014599]
  4. National Center for Research Resources [UL1RR024999]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Epithelia within tubular organs form and expand lumens. Failure of these processes can result in serious developmental anomalies. Although tight junction assembly is crucial to epithelial polarization, the contribution of specific tight junction proteins to lumenogenesis is undefined. Here, we show that ZO-1 (also known as TJP1) is necessary for the formation of single lumens. Epithelia lacking this tight junction scaffolding protein form cysts with multiple lumens and are defective in the earliest phases of polarization, both in two and three dimensions. Expression of ZO-1 domain-deletion mutants demonstrated that the actin-binding region and U5-GuK domain are crucial to single lumen development. For actin-binding region, but not U5-GuK domain, mutants, this could be overcome by strong polarization cues from the extracellular matrix. Analysis of the U5-GuK binding partners shroom2, a-catenin and occludin showed that only occludin deletion led to multi-lumen cysts. Like ZO-1-deficiency, occludin deletion led to mitotic spindle orientation defects. Single lumen formation required the occludin OCEL domain, which binds to ZO-1. We conclude that ZO-1-occludin interactions regulate multiple phases of epithelial polarization by providing cell-intrinsic signals that are required for single lumen formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据