4.5 Article

Unique and redundant β-catenin regulatory roles of two Dishevelled paralogs during C. elegans asymmetric cell division

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 129, 期 5, 页码 983-993

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.175802

关键词

APC; Asymmetric Cell Division; beta-Catenin; Dishevelled; Wnt

资金

  1. American Cancer Society
  2. Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center [RSG-11-140-01-DC]
  3. Comprehensive Cancer Center [IRG] [77-004-31]
  4. Roy J. Carver Charitable Trust [13-4131]
  5. National Science Foundation [IOS-1456941]
  6. Evelyn Hart Watson fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway is utilized across metazoans. However, the mechanism of signal transduction, especially dissociation of the beta-catenin destruction complex by Dishevelled proteins, remains controversial. Here, we describe the function of the Dishevelled paralogs DSH-2 and MIG-5 in the Wnt/beta-catenin asymmetry (W beta A) pathway in Caenorhabditis elegans, where W beta A drives asymmetric cell divisions throughout development. We find that DSH-2 and MIG-5 redundantly regulate cell fate in hypodermal seam cells. Similarly, both DSH-2 and MIG-5 are required for positive regulation of SYS-1 (a C. elegans beta-catenin), but MIG-5 has a stronger effect on the polarity of SYS-1 localization. We show that MIG-5 controls cortical APR-1 (the C. elegans APC) localization. DSH-2 and MIG-5 both regulate the localization of WRM-1 (another C. elegans beta-catenin), acting together as negative regulators of WRM-1 nuclear localization. Finally, we demonstrate that overexpression of DSH-2 or MIG-5 in seam cells leads to stabilization of SYS-1 in the anterior seam daughter, solidifying the Dishevelled proteins as positive regulators of SYS-1. Overall, we have further defined the role of Dishevelled in the W beta A signaling pathway, and demonstrated that DSH-2 and MIG-5 regulate cell fate, beta-catenin nuclear levels and the polarity of beta-catenin regulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据