4.5 Article

Aging-Associated Cognitive Decline is Reversed by D-Serine Supplementation

期刊

ENEURO
卷 9, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0176-22.2022

关键词

aging; cognitive flexibility; D-serine; fMRI; functional brain connectivity

资金

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACyT) Ciencia de Frontera [171874]
  2. CONACyT Problemas Nacionales [2132]
  3. PAPIIT-DGAPA [IA208022, IA208120]
  4. CONACYT Ciencia Basica [A1-S-8686]
  5. UNAM-DGAPA PAPIIT [IN201121]
  6. Programa de Doctorado en Biomedicina, from Universidad Autonoma de Queretaro
  7. CONACyT [472970, 815419, 786125, 778405, 778596]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that D-serine supplementation can reverse the decline in cognitive flexibility associated with aging and partially restore large-scale brain system function without inducing nephrotoxicity, showing potential therapeutic benefits for reversing age-related brain changes.
Brain aging is a natural process that involves structural and functional changes that lead to cognitive decline, even in healthy subjects. This detriment has been associated with NMDA receptor (NMDAR) hypofunction because of a reduction in the brain levels of D-serine, the endogenous NMDAR co-agonist. However, it is not clear whether D-serine supplementation could be used as an intervention to reduce or reverse age-related brain alterations. In the present work, we aimed to analyze the D-serine effect on aging-associated alterations in cellular and large-scale brain systems that could support cognitive flexibility in rats. We found that D-serine supplementation reverts the age-related decline in cognitive flexibility, frontal dendritic spine density, and partially restored large-scale functional connectivity without inducing nephrotoxicity; instead, D-serine restored the thickness of the renal epithelial cells that were affected by age. Our results suggest that D-serine could be used as a therapeutic target to reverse age-related brain alterations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据