4.7 Article

Iron and manganese co-limit the growth of two phytoplankton groups dominant at two locations of the Drake Passage

期刊

COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY
卷 5, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s42003-022-03148-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [TR 899/4-1]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SPP1158, KO5563/1-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study highlights the importance of manganese alongside iron in the growth of key phytoplankton groups in the Southern Ocean. While iron availability was found to be the main driver, manganese co-limitation was observed in certain phytoplankton species and groups, indicating that the two elements play a key role in shaping the phytoplankton community structure.
While it has been recently demonstrated that both iron (Fe) and manganese (Mn) control Southern Ocean (SO) plankton biomass, how in particular Mn governs phytoplankton species composition remains yet unclear. This study, for the first time, highlights the importance of Mn next to Fe for growth of two key SO phytoplankton groups at two locations in the Drake Passage (West and East). Even though the bulk parameter chlorophyll a indicated Fe availability as main driver of both phytoplankton assemblages, the flow cytometric and microscopic analysis revealed FeMn co-limitation of a key phytoplankton group at each location: at West the dominant diatom Fragilariopsis and one subgroup of picoeukaryotes, which numerically dominated the East community. Hence, the limitation by both Fe and Mn and their divergent requirements among phytoplankton species and groups can be a key factor for shaping SO phytoplankton community structure. Iron and manganese play an important role in phytoplankton biomass control, but the exact effect of these elements on species composition has remained unknown. Conducting phytoplankton incubation experiments at two Drake Passage sites, we demonstrate how iron and manganese regulate phytoplankton community structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据