4.5 Article

Manufacturing of pure copper with extraordinary strength-ductility-conductivity balance by cryorolling and annealing

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cirpj.2022.03.010

关键词

Nanomaterials; Copper; Back-annealing; Microstructure evolution; Mechanical behavior; Electrical properties

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a pure copper with an exceptional strength-ductility-conductivity balance was obtained through asymmetric cryorolling followed by low-temperature annealing. The mechanical properties of copper were significantly improved after annealing, and the electrical conductivity was much higher compared to other pure coppers.
To obtain a pure copper with extraordinary strength-ductility-conductivity balance, asymmetric cryorolling followed by low-temperature (200 degrees C) annealing was employed. The microstructural-mechanical-electrical properties of the samples were investigated. The results showed that multiple twinning was formed after the partial annealing of deformed copper. The copper annealed for 60 min exhibited a hardness, yield strength, and tensile strength of 38.1 HB, 192 MPa, and 422 MPa, respectively, while a large total elongation of 37.2% was obtained. Also, the annealed copper had a larger strain hardening rate at epsilon higher than 0.023 owing to the creation of twin chains. The fracture surface of the 60-min annealed copper was dominated by only ductile dimple features. The post-annealed copper showed an extraordinary electrical conductivity of 99.58%IACS, which is much larger than that for all pure coppers with UTS higher than 400 MPa. It was found that using second phase particles with high electrical conductivity was a better strengthening mechanism than strain hardening and grain boundary strengthening. An extraordinary strength-ductility-conductivity balance was achieved in the current pure copper compared to other pure coppers. This was due to the existence of copper oxide, and the formation of twin chains in the present work.(c) 2022 CIRP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据