4.6 Article

Growth-Associated Droplet Shrinkage for Bacterial Quantification, Growth Monitoring, and Separation by Ultrahigh-Throughput Microfluidics

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 7, 期 14, 页码 12039-12047

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c00248

关键词

-

资金

  1. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-17-CE07-0009]
  2. IdEx Unistra [ANR-10-IDEX0002]
  3. SFRI-STRAT'US project [ANR-20-SFRI0012]
  4. EUR IMCBio [ANR-17-EURE-0023]
  5. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
  6. Initiative of Excellence (IdEx)
  7. Universite de Strasbourg

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Droplet-based microfluidics is an attractive approach for microbiology research as it allows for more efficient and accurate analysis. Cultivating bacterial communities in droplets reduces representation bias and enables absolute quantification of microbial cells, as well as selective recovery of microorganisms of interest.
Microbiology still relies on en masse cultivation for selection, isolation, and characterization of microorganisms of interest. This constrains the diversity of microbial types and metabolisms that can be investigated in the laboratory also because of intercellular competition during cultivation. Cell individualization by droplet-based microfluidics prior to experimental analysis provides an attractive alternative to access a larger fraction of the microbial biosphere, miniaturizing the required equipment and minimizing reagent use for increased and more efficient analytical throughput. Here, we show that cultivation of a model two-strain bacterial community in droplets significantly reduces representation bias in the grown culture compared to batch cultivation. Further, and based on the droplet shrinkage observed upon cell proliferation, we provide proof-of-concept for a simple strategy that allows absolute quantification of microbial cells in a sample as well as selective recovery of microorganisms of interest for subsequent experimental characterization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据