4.3 Article

Benefit of statin therapy in patients with coronary spasm-induced acute myocardial infarction

期刊

JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 68, 期 1-2, 页码 7-12

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2015.09.013

关键词

Coronary vasospasm; Myocardial infarction; Statin; Prognosis

资金

  1. Korean Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [HI13C1527]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Coronary artery spasm is associated with vascular smooth muscle hyper-reactivity. Statins suppress coronary spasm by inhibiting the vascular smooth muscle contraction. However, it is unclear whether statin therapy benefits patients with coronary spasm-induced acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods and results: We analyzed 501 (median age 57 years; male/female, 346/155) patients with coronary spasm-induced AMI with nonobstructive coronary arteries (stenosis severity <50%) from the Korea AMI Registry between November 2005 and October 2013. They were divided into two groups according to statin prescription at discharge (statin group n = 292; nonstatin group n = 209). The primary endpoint was the composite of 12-month major adverse cardiac events, including all causes of death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. The primary endpoint occurred in 17 patients during 12 months of follow-up. Statin therapy significantly reduced the risk of the composite primary endpoint [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.30; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.09-0.97; p = 0.045]. Statin therapy reduced the risk of myocardial infarction (HR: 0.19; 95% CI: 0.04-0.93; p = 0.040). However, we found no significant difference in the risk of the composite of all-cause death. Conclusion: Statin therapy in patients with coronary spasm-induced AMI with nonobstructive coronary arteries was associated with improved clinical outcome, which was predominantly accounted for by reducing the incidence of myocardial infarction. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Japanese College of Cardiology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据