4.6 Review

A Journey into Animal Models of Human Osteomyelitis: A Review

期刊

MICROORGANISMS
卷 10, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10061135

关键词

osteomyelitis; animal models; orthopedics; microbiology; immunology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Osteomyelitis is a bone infection that can spread through hematogenous, contiguous, or direct inoculation routes. Animal models can be used to study osteomyelitis, and different species are chosen for research. The clinical manifestation of hematogenous osteomyelitis varies due to multiple factors, but these variables can be controlled and tested through animal models.
Osteomyelitis is an infection of the bone characterized by progressive inflammatory destruction and apposition of new bone that can spread via the hematogenous route (hematogenous osteomyelitis (HO)), contiguous spread (contiguous osteomyelitis (CO)), and direct inoculation (osteomyelitis associated with peripheral vascular insufficiency (PVI)). Given the significant financial burden posed by osteomyelitis patient management, the development of new preventive and treatment methods is warranted. To achieve this objective, implementing animal models (AMs) of infection such as rats, mice, rabbits, avians, dogs, sheep, goats, and pigs might be of the essence. This review provides a literature analysis of the AMs developed and used to study osteomyelitis. Historical relevance and clinical applicability were taken into account to choose the best AMs, and some study methods are briefly described. Furthermore, the most significant strengths and limitations of each species as AM are discussed, as no single model incorporates all features of osteomyelitis. HO's clinical manifestation results in extreme variability between patients due to multiple variables (e.g., age, sex, route of infection, anatomical location, and concomitant diseases) that could alter clinical studies. However, these variables can be controlled and tested through different animal models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据