4.5 Article

Doping and Vacancy Engineering in a Sandwich-like g-C3N4/NiCo2O4 Heterostructure for Robust Oxygen Evolution

期刊

CHEMNANOMAT
卷 8, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cnma.202200191

关键词

Doping engineering; g-C3N4; NiCo2O4 heterostructure; OER; Porous lamellar; Vacancy engineering

资金

  1. Training Program for Academic and Technical Leaders of Major Disciplines in Jiangxi Province [20212BCJ23020]
  2. Science and Technology Project of Jiangxi Provincial Department of Education [GJJ211305]
  3. Jingdezhen Science and Technology Planning Project [20212GYZD009-04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

N doping and O vacancy were introduced into a g-C3N4/NiCo2O4 heterostructure. The heterostructure exhibited excellent oxygen evolution reduction (OER) activity and long-term stability, showing great potential in water splitting applications.
Herein, N doping and O vacancy were simultaneously introduced into a g-C3N4/NiCo2O4 heterostructure by a simple reflux and calcination strategy. The constructed g-C3N4 displayed a porous lamellar structure with N-doped carbon. Furthermore, numerous ultrathin NiCo2O4 nanosheets with abundant O vacancies tend to grow vertically on the porous g-C3N4 lamellar, forming a sandwich-like heterostructure. The prepared sandwich-like g-C3N4/NiCo2O4 heterostructure exhibited excellent oxygen evolution reduction (OER) activity with a low overpotential of 294 mV at 10 mA cm(-2). Meanwhile, the heterostructure presented superior long-term stability, retaining a current density of 97.9% after a 50 h chronoamperometry test. The outstanding OER performance is ascribed to the synergistic effect of doping and vacancy engineering in the catalyst, the strong coupling interaction between g-C3N4 and NiCo2O4, and the porous sandwich-like structure with abundant active sites. Therefore, the synthetic strategy of g-C3N4/NiCo2O4 heterostructure can be extended to fabricate high-performance noble metal-free electrocatalysts for water splitting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据