4.5 Article

Quark stars in f (R, T) gravity with an interacting quark equation of state

期刊

PHYSICS OF THE DARK UNIVERSE
卷 35, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.dark.2022.100990

关键词

Quark star; f(R, T) gravity

资金

  1. King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi, Thailand's Post-doctoral Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent advances in instrumentation and computational methods have led to increased interest in studying the properties of nuclear matter under extreme conditions and the core of neutron stars. By analyzing the observations of pulsars, we investigated compact static configurations composed of interacting quark matter and derived conclusions that provide a more efficient explanation for the observational facts.
Recent instrumentation and computational advances have increased interest in determining the properties of nuclear matter under extreme conditions and the core of neutron stars (NSs) is an excellent test bed for nuclear astrophysical theories. Moreover, the detection of pulsars heavier than 2M(circle dot) have put strong constraints on the NS matter equation of state (EoS), and consequently the interior composition. Here, we investigate compact static configurations whose matter field is comprised of homogeneous, neutral 3-flavor interacting quark matter with O(m(s)(4)) corrections, namely, interacting quark EoS in the context of f (R, T) gravity theories. The EoS consists of the bag constant B and the interaction parameter a(4) that plays an important role in the construction of a quark star model. Numerical computations are required to solve the structure equations and to derive the mass-radius relation for a given equation of state. In addition, we employ the maximum mass from two pulsars PSR J0348+0432 and PSR J0751+1807 as an input for inferring the dense matter EoS. Our finding allows us to explain some observational facts more efficiently than in standard General Relativity. (C) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据