4.4 Article

Destroying the event horizon of a nonsingular rotating quantum-corrected black hole

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP04(2022)066

关键词

Black Holes; Spacetime Singularities; Models of Quantum Gravity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11875151, 12075103, 12047501, 12105126]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2021M701531]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [lzujbky-2021-it34, lzujbky-2021-pd08]
  4. 111 Project [B20063]
  5. Lanzhou City's scientific research funding

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the possibility of overspinning a nonsingular rotating quantum-corrected black hole by a test particle and a scalar field. The influence of the quantum parameter on the destruction of the event horizon is analyzed.
The destruction of the event horizon of a nonsingular black hole, which is not prevented by the weak cosmic censorship conjecture, might provide us the possibility to access quantum regime of gravity inside black hole. We investigate the possibility of overspinning a nonsingular rotating quantum-corrected black hole by a test particle and a scalar field in this paper, and analyse the effect of the quantum parameter on the destruction of the event horizon. For the test particle injection, both extremal and near-extremal black holes cannot be overspun due to the existence of the quantum parameter. And the larger the quantum parameter the harder the black hole to be overspun. It seems that the quantum parameter acts as a protector to prevent the black hole to be destroyed. However, for the test scalar field scattering, both extremal and near-extremal black holes can be destroyed. Due to the loop quantum gravity correction, the angular velocity of the extremal black hole shifts from that of the extremal Kerr black hole. This provides a small range of wave modes to destroy the event horizon of the quantum-corrected black hole.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据