4.2 Article

Guidewire-Assisted Reduction Technology Combined with Postural Reduction Improves the Success Rate of Internal Vein Catheterisation

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE ENGINEERING
卷 2022, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2022/7171578

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that guidewire-assisted reduction technology combined with postural reduction can effectively improve the success rate of reducing malpositioned catheters in the internal jugular vein.
Objective. To investigate the value of guidewire-assisted reduction technology (which increases the stiffness of a catheter through the use of a guidewire, thereby protecting the puncture point and distal vein from breakage) combined with postural reduction for malpositioned catheters in the internal jugular vein during peripherally inserted central venous catheter catheterisation. Methods. From January 2015 to August 2020, we used ultrasound to perform guided puncture and monitoring. We identified the tip of the catheter as malpositioned in the internal jugular vein in 99 patients during the catheterisation process. These patients were divided randomly into a control group and an experimental group. In the control group, 43 cases received guidewire-assisted reduction technology, while in the experimental group, 56 patients received guidewire-assisted reduction technology combined with an upright posture. This study compared the efficacy of these two methods. Results. The results showed that 30 catheters were reduced successfully in the control group, with a success rate of 69.8%. In the experimental group, 53 cases were successfully reduced, with a success rate of 94.6%. The catheter reduction success rate in the experimental group was significantly higher than in the control group; this was a statistically significant difference (P=0.001). Conclusion. Guidewire-assisted reduction technology combined with postural reduction can improve the success rate of the reduction of malpositioned catheters in the internal jugular vein.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据