4.7 Article

A coordinate-based co-localization index to quantify and visualize spatial associations in single-molecule localization microscopy

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-08746-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council [ERC-StG 716011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of super-resolution microscopy techniques, such as SMLM, has increased the ability to resolve protein distribution at nanometer resolution. New quantitative approaches are required to exploit the unique nature of SMLM datasets.
Visualizing the subcellular distribution of proteins and determining whether specific proteins co-localize is one of the main strategies in determining the organization and potential interactions of protein complexes in biological samples. The development of super-resolution microscopy techniques such as single-molecule localization microscopy (SMLM) has tremendously increased the ability to resolve protein distribution at nanometer resolution. As super-resolution imaging techniques are becoming instrumental in revealing novel biological insights, new quantitative approaches that exploit the unique nature of SMLM datasets are required. Here, we present a new, local density-based algorithm to quantify co-localization in dual-color SMLM datasets. We show that this method is broadly applicable and only requires molecular coordinates and their localization precision as inputs. Using simulated point patterns, we show that this method robustly measures the co-localization in dual-color SMLM datasets, independent of localization density, but with high sensitivity towards local enrichments. We further validated our method using SMLM imaging of the microtubule network in epithelial cells and used it to study the spatial association between proteins at neuronal synapses. Together, we present a simple and easy-to-use, but powerful method to analyze the spatial association of molecules in dual-color SMLM datasets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据