4.6 Article

Research on Dewatering Characteristics of Waste Slurry from Pipe Jacking Construction

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 15, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma15062242

关键词

waste slurry; flocculation; solidification; pipe jacking

资金

  1. Shanghai Rising-Star Program [19QB1401800]
  2. China Scholarship Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A large amount of waste slurry is generated during pipe jacking projects, which needs to be rapidly reduced and utilized. This study investigated the flocculation-settling and solidification treatment of waste slurry, and found effective methods for dewatering and resource utilization, providing reference for engineering applications.
A large amount of waste slurry is produced during the construction of pipe jacking projects. To avoid the waste slurry occupying too much urban land, it needs to be rapidly reduced. Due to the complex composition of waste slurry, the existing dewatering methods face the problem of low efficiency, and the soil after dewatering is difficult to recycle as soil materials due to high water content and low strength. There is currently a lack of research on dewatering and resource utilization of waste slurry from pipe jacking projects. In response to this problem, this paper studies the flocculation-settling characteristics of waste slurry and the mechanical properties of solidified sediment. It was found that the anionic polyacrylamide (APAM) 7126 obtained the best separation effect if the waste slurry contains bentonite, which increases the zeta potential, resulting in poor separation. Thus, FeCl3 center dot 6H(2)O and APAM 7126 can be used as compound conditioners. The sediment after settling was further added with 20-30% sulphate aluminum cement (SAC), and the unconfined compressive strength of the solidified sediment for 3 days could exceed 30 kPa. After flocculation-settling and solidification treatment, the waste pipe jacking slurry can be quickly dewatered into a soil material with a certain strength, which provides a reference for engineering applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据