4.3 Article

Impact of diabetes group visits on patient clinical and self-reported outcomes in community health centers

期刊

BMC ENDOCRINE DISORDERS
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12902-022-00972-1

关键词

Group visits; Diabetes; Community Health Centers

资金

  1. Chicago Center for Diabetes Translation Research [NIDDK P30 DK092949]
  2. NIDDK Career Development Award [K23 DK087903-01A1]
  3. University of Chicago Center for Research Informatics [NIH CTSA UL1 TR000430]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that diabetes group visits conducted in community health centers can significantly improve patients' blood glucose levels, self-care behaviors, diabetes distress, and processes of care, with a positive impact on improving diabetes management outcomes for patients.
Background Diabetes group visits (GVs) are a promising way to deliver high quality care but have been understudied in community health centers (CHCs), across multiple sites, or with a focus on patient-centered outcomes. Methods We trained staff and healthcare providers from six CHCs across five Midwestern states to implement a 6-month GV program at their sites. We assessed the impact of diabetes GVs on patient clinical and self-reported outcomes and processes of care compared to patients receiving usual care at these sites during the same period using a prospective controlled study design. Results CHCs enrolled 51 adult patients with diabetes with glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) >= 8% for the GV intervention and conducted chart review of 72 patients receiving usual care. We analyzed A1C at baseline, 6, and 12 months, low-density lipoproteins (LDL), blood pressure, and patient-reported outcomes. GV patients had a larger decrease in A1C from baseline to 6 months (-1.04%, 95% CI: -1.64, -0.44) and 12 months (-1.76, 95% CI: -2.44, -1.07) compared to usual care; there was no change in blood pressure or LDL. GV patients had higher odds of receiving a flu vaccination, foot exam, eye exam, and lipid panel in the past year compared to usual care but not a dental exam, urine microalbumin test, or blood pressure check. For GV patients, diabetes distress decreased, diabetes-related quality of life improved, and self-reported frequency of healthy eating and checking blood sugar increased from baseline to 6 months, but there was no change in exercise or medication adherence. Conclusions A diabetes GV intervention improved blood glucose levels, self-care behaviors, diabetes distress, and processes of care among adults with elevated A1Cs compared to patients receiving usual care. Future studies are needed to assess the sustainability of clinical improvements and costs of the GV model in CHCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据