4.5 Review

The intestinal and biliary microbiome in autoimmune liver disease-current evidence and concepts

期刊

SEMINARS IN IMMUNOPATHOLOGY
卷 44, 期 4, 页码 485-507

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00281-022-00936-6

关键词

Intestinal barrier; Liver disease; Microbiome; Microbiota; Autoimmunity; Autoimmune hepatitis; Primary biliary cholangitis; Primary sclerosing cholangitis

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) Clinical Research Unit 306 Primary sclerosing cholangitis [KFO306]
  2. Landesforschungsforderung Hamburg [FV-78]
  3. YAEL Foundation
  4. German Research Foundation [420943353, 438122637]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Autoimmune liver diseases are a group of immune-mediated liver diseases that are associated with abnormalities in the gut microbiome and immune system activation. Current research has made progress in understanding the role of the microbiome, but there are still limitations and challenges. Future studies and clinical applications hold potential for further advancements.
Autoimmune liver diseases are a group of immune-mediated liver diseases with three distinct entities, including autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cholangitis, and primary sclerosing cholangitis. The interplay of genetic and environmental factors leads to the breakdown of self-tolerance, resulting in hyper-responsiveness, and auto-aggressive immune activation. Emerging evidence links autoimmune liver diseases with alterations of the commensal microbiome configuration and aberrant immune system activation by microbial signals, mainly via the gut-liver axis. Thus, the microbiome is a new frontier to deepen the pathogenetic understanding, uncover biomarkers, and inspire innovative treatments. Herein, we review the current evidence on the role of the microbiome in autoimmune liver diseases from both clinical and basic research. We highlight recent achievements and also bottlenecks and limitations. Moreover, we give an outlook on future developments and potential for clinical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据